Treść książki
Przejdź do opcji czytnikaPrzejdź do nawigacjiPrzejdź do informacjiPrzejdź do stopki
Thetestofjudicialdecisioniswhetheritislegallyandintellectually
credibleasananswertotheproblemthejudgehasbeencalledupon
toresolve.Forthejudgenottotakeadecisionisbothlegallyand
intellectuallyindefensible,sinceitisadenialofitsjudicialfunction
DavidA.O.Edward,JudicialActivism-MythorReality?
VanGendenLoos,Costav.EnelandtheVanDuyn
familyrevisited
Indeed,itisincomplexcasesthatcourtsoftenprovewhattheyare
(andarenot)capableof.(...)
„Sayingwhatthelawis”oftenamountstoariskyventure,butone
thatcannotbeavoidediftheECJistosecureitsexternalandinternal
legitimacyinpursuingthetaskconferredonitinArticle19TEU
KoenLenaerts,HowtheECJthinks:Astudy
onjudiciallegitimacy
Infact,(...)theCourtwouldappeartohavegrantedanewremedynot
expresslyforeseenintheTreaties,byvirtueoftwogeneralprovisions
oftheTreaty,Art.5and164...Thedoorwouldappeartohavebeen
openedtotheexerciseofnewsortsofjudicialcontrolinthecomplex
relationshipbetweenCommunityinstitutionsandMemberStates,
goingbeyondthebroadinterpretationwhichtheCourthadalready
giventotheexpresspowersundertheTreaties
JohnA.Usher,GeneralcourseinEuropeanCommunitylaw:
Thecontinuingdevelopmentoflawandinstitutions
TheCourtwasfacedwithanalmostimpossibletaskintryingto
reconcilethedutyimposedonitbyArticle164anditscounterparts
withtheincompletesystemofremedieslaiddownintheTreaties.
Ithasrightlychosentogiveprecedencetotheneedtoensurerespect
fortheruleoflawintheCommunity
AnthonyArnull,DoestheCourtofJusticehaveinherent
jurisdiction?
