Treść książki

Przejdź do opcji czytnikaPrzejdź do nawigacjiPrzejdź do informacjiPrzejdź do stopki
14
ChapterI.Roadaccidentriskmanagement
Publicsafetyisalsounderstoodasacircumstanceinwhichthecitizenry
(notindicatedindividually)thatlivesinthestateandwithinthesocietyisnot
atanyrisk,regardlessofitspossibleorigin.Publicsafetyprotectionisaservice
ofastatemarkingtheboundariesofsafetyanddecidingonthephenomena
inconsistentwithsafety-phenomenawhichviolateorpossiblyimpedenor-
malfunctioningofthestate30.Onanentitybasis,publicsafetyisunderstood
as“totalityofconditionsandinstitutionssecuringlife,healthandpropertyof
thecitizensaswellaspoliticalsystemandnationwidewealth”
.mecommon
denominatorofthedefinitionandconceptofpublicsafetyisthereferenceto
threebasicissues:lackofthreatstouninhibitedfunctioningofthecitizen(pri-
marilyprotectionofhisorherlife,healthandproperty),undisturbedfunc-
tioningofthestateandpursuitofitsinterestsaswellascitizens)adherenceto
theprinciplesofcommunitylifeandlegalnorms(adherencetopublicorder).
melastaspectmentionedtranslatestolegalsafetythatconstitutesoneof
theaspectsofthephilosophicaltriadembracingalsotheconstructsofjustice
andpurposefulness.meseconstructsconstitutethecomponentsofRadbruch)s
conceptoflaw.Legalsafetyisperceivedasanembodimentoflegalorderand
consequently-embodimentofpositivelaw31.mepurposefulnessisunder-
stoodascommonwealthatinordertofulfilitsrules,excludestheindividual
andunderlinesthemeaningofthesocialorganism-thewhole32.mepurpose-
fulnessisdeterminedbyanddirectlyassociatedwiththecountertypesinthe
individuals)andcommunities)viewsonthestateandlaw.meremainingele-
ments-justiceandlegalsafety-arepostulatesof“generalsignificance”whose
essenceisnotsettledbasingonrelativisticpositions.misisoneofthefewor
eventheonlysimilaritybetweenthem.Justiceisaguidelineoftheconceptof
law;itdetermineswhatlawis33.Radbruchperceivesjusticeasaformoflaw;
30
E.Ura,Prawnezagadnieniabezpieczeństwapaństwa,Rzeszów1988,p.124.
31
T.Chauvin,Sprawiedliwość:międzycelowościąabezpieczeństwemprawnym.Ewolucja
poglądówGustawaRadbrucha,“StudiaIuridica”1999,Vol.37,p.27ń.
32
G.Radbruch,DerZweckdesRechts[in:]idem,DerMenschimRecht,Göttingen1957.
ItisworthnoticingthatRadbruch)sviewsevolved.Earlier,hetookthepositionthatpur-
posefulnessisdińerentthanjusticeduetothefactofindividualisationofparticularcases
inequalities-idem,GrundzugederRechtsphilosophie,Leipzig1914;Polishtranslation
C.Znamierowski,Zaryslozoiprawa,Warszawa1938.
33
H.Kelsen,Czystateoriaprawaajurysprudencjaanalityczna[in:]Współczesnateoria
ilozoaprawanaZachodzieEuropy,eds.T.Gizbert-Studnickietal.,Kraków1985,p.90.