Treść książki
Przejdź do opcji czytnikaPrzejdź do nawigacjiPrzejdź do informacjiPrzejdź do stopki
какизобразитьперворечь
Библиография
47
Аверинцев1971=Аверинцев,С[ергей]Сl:nГре-
ческая«литература»иближневосточная«сло-
весность»lДватворческихпринципа”
,Вопросы
литературы,8(1971):40-68l
Витгенштейн1994=Витгенштейн,Л[юдвиг]:nЛо-
гико-философскийтрактат”[в:]Философскиера-
боты,чl1,Москва1994l
Ноэль1995=Ноэль,Б[ернар]:Магритт,Слово,
Москва1995(Noël,Bernard:Magritte,Crown
Publishers,NewYork1977)l
Эко2004=Эко,У[мберто]:Открытоепроизве-
дение.Формаинеопределенностьвсовременной
поэтике,Академическийпроект,Санкт-Петер-
бург2004(Eco,Umberto:Operaaperta:forma
eindeterminazionenellepoetichecontemporanee,
Bompiani,Milano1962)l
VadimL.Rabinovich
Howcanonerenderprotolanguage?
Thebeginningofthecenturyanditsendareconsideredinthemodeofcultureascreativityandareex-
trapolatedontotheentirecenturyseenasoverarchinghypertextl
Twoculturalprojectsofsignificantimportthathavemarkedthebeginningandendofthe20thcentury
arechosenforcomparativeanalysis,namely,theavant-gardebook-makingexperienceofKhlebnikov-
Kruchenykh(Futuristiclithographicbook-makingasacooperativeoflonersandtheirfellowartists;“We
andI”addressedtotheimpersonal“They”)andtheInternetprojectostensiblyaimedat“Everybody”
butinfacttargetingeverysingleindividualexperiencingboundlessandunbearableanguishlWhoare
theseartists?KlMalevichwithhisSuprematisttechniques,MlLarionovwithhisRayonism,OlRozanova
elaboratingher“asitis”principle,tonamebutafewlItistheywhovisualizetheprotolanguageofour
languagecreatorslIwilldiscussthewaysinwhichtheydoitlEarly20thcenturyavant-gardespeechas
thereservoirofendlessbeginningsembodiedinbookform-creativityrisingfromtheelementaldepths
of“innerspeech”-isresolutelyirreproducible,consistingofonesolecopyandalwaysoccupyingthefirst
page(ifnotpagezero)lThesameholdstrueforthewordtakenfromtheInternetwiththesignificant
differencethatitisafinishedform,butonethatisimmediatelyengulfedinthevirtualrealitygenerated
bycomputerslItisinthiswaythattheendofthecentury,formingashortcircuitwithitsbeginning,
regeneratesthephenomenonofthebookasmanuscript,albeittechnogenic;resuscitatestheculturesof
individualworldsinordertoreplacetheclichédclonesofmassculturelAnothertypeofverbalization(un-
likevisualization)ofprotolanguage“texts”isthepresentationoftheauthorproper,whohasencountered
hisowncharacters-interlocutorsonehundredyearslaterandhasengagedinabelateddialoguewiththem
fromtwocornerslAstheyacquaintthemselveswiththeoddFuturisticmaterial,characterandauthorare
graduallytransformedintoeachother:theauthorbecomesaFuturistofthefirsttwodecadesofthe20th
century,whilethecharacters,intheiranalyticshamelessness,aremadetoliveinthepresentlThustheir
continuedlifeofahundredyearsisrestoredwithitsrhythmicpausesofbeing-togetherandhencetheliv-
ingintermittenceofcom-passionatebreaths-inthecultureofanadvancingavant-gardeprotolanguagel
Futuristtextsareidiomaticvariationsinthecourseoflife-onthewavesofapulsatingmemoryl
