OSTATNIO PRZEGLĄDANE PRZEZ CIEBIE
ВСЕ КНИГИ
Wincenty Kilarski, Elżbieta Pyza, Grzegorz Tylko
Alexander Mclenann, Andy Bates, Phil Turner, Mike White
Anna Grabińska-Łoniewska, Bożena Słomczyńska, Anna Rutkowska-Narożniak, Maria Łebkowska, Tomasz Słomczyński, Ewa Zborowska
Małgorzata Bulanda, Sława Szostek
Bruce Alberts, Dennis Bray, Karen Hopkin
Bruce Alberts, Dennis Bray, Karen Hopkin
Paulina Wigner, Angela Dziedzic, Rafał Szelenberger
Agata Kobyłka, Aleksandra Gogół, Kinga Nakonieczna, Magdalena Michalak, Klaudia Gustaw, Magdalena Polak-Berecka
Adrianna Rafalska, Magdalena Krauze, Agata Kobyłka, Łukasz Tyburski, Małgorzata Górna
Małgorzata Budzeń, Damian Zieliński, Kamila Soboska, Magdalena Doniak, Andrzej Kaźmierczak, Małgorzata Góral, Urszula Pankiewicz, Barbara Furmaga, Florentyna Tyrała, Maja Warzecha, Aleksandra Piątek
Dariusz Wolski, Paulina Kęsak, Urszula Pankiewicz, Joanna Stadnik, Kamil Szczepka, Ewa Broda, Olga Gęska
The previous „Catalogue of the beetles of Belarus” was published over 25 years ago (Alexandrovich et al. 1996). Since that time numerous taxonomic changes have been introduced, new data on the already recorded species were collected, information on 868 species that were not included in this earlier list were gathered, moreover, 111 species were previously wrongly identified. New research almost doubled the species number in the families that had been poorly investigated, i.e. Staphylinidae (275 newly recorded species), Nitidulidae (36) and Cryptophagidae (33). In The Catalogue of Palaearctic Coleoptera (2004-2013, 2015-2020) 109 species were erroneously registered in Belarus. Furthermore, numerous species long known from this country were omitted. As a good example, in which these errors were corrected, may serve the separate analysis of Carabidae (Aleksandrowicz et al. 2016). In a large work like The Catalogue of Palaearctic Coleoptera, which deals with a huge number of species, concentrating on erroneous records from one region could appear overpedantic. However, as 25% of species from the well investigated fauna of Belarus were missing, the informative value of data presented there, is largely diminished. Thus, 71 common species were not included in the Catalogue, 26 species were wrongly listed in this publication.(Fragment Wstępu)
Настройте текст для его корректного отображения на любом устройстве
Создавайте заметки
Начните читать с того места, на котором закончили
У меня уже есть учетная запись в онлайн библиотеке IBUK Libra
У меня нет аккаунта в онлайн библиотеке IBUK Libra
PAMIĘTAJ!
Twój PIN do zasobów w:
Wygasa: сегодня
Aby zdobyć nowy PIN, skontaktuj się z Twoją biblioteką.
В течение нескольких минут вы получите сообщение на .
Нажмите на кнопку в нем, чтобы подтвердить подписку на рассылку и получить бесплатную электронную книгу.
Примите Пользовательское соглашение, чтобы продолжить использование веб-сайта.