Treść książki
Przejdź do opcji czytnikaPrzejdź do nawigacjiPrzejdź do informacjiPrzejdź do stopki
14
Introduction
headiselaboratedupon,selectedcompoundtypologiesarementioned,
andsomediagnostictestsaredescribedwhichareused(invariouslan-
guages)todistinguishbetweenmorphologicalcompoundsandsyntactic
phrasesiTheexistenceofatransitionzonebetweencompoundsproper
andfreesyntacticcombinationsisdemonstratediChapter1closeswith
aconciseintroductiontosomeassumptionsofConstructionMorpholo-
gy
iChapter2discussesmorphologicalcompoundsandcompound-like
multi-wordunitsintheEnglishlanguageiItexemplifiesdimculties
indrawingtheboundarybetweenEnglishcompoundnounsproperand
phrasalnounsiSyntacticbehaviourofcompoundsandphrasalnounsis
comparediRA+Ncombinations(eigi,polarbear,postalservice,solarpanel)
andgenitivecompounds(suchasdog’searandmen’sshoes)areshownto
exhibitword-likepropertiesiCasesarediscussedwhenNNcompounds
coexistwithsimilargenitivecompoundsorwithRA+Ncombinationsi
Chapters3,4,and5dealwiththedatafromthePolishlanguageiAnover-
viewisgivenofbasictypesofcompositeexpressionsinPolishinChap-
ter3iChapter4investigatesword-likeandphrase-likepropertiesofseveral
typesofphrasalnounswhicharetraditionallyreferredtoas“juxtaposi-
tions”(Polizestawienia)iChapter5discussescompetitionbetweenPol-
ishcompoundsproperandjuxtapositionsiItisarguedthatpatternsfor
phrasalnounsareusedproductivelyinPolishtocoinmulti-wordexpres-
sionswhichcan“fillthegap”whenamorphologicalcompoundisnot
availableiInChapter6,anattemptismadetoapplythetheoreticalap-
paratusofConstructionMorphologytotheanalysisofcompoundnouns
andphrasalnounsinbothlanguagesiConclusionsareformulatedinthe
finalchapteri
