Folia Philosophica. Vol. 34. Special issue. Forms of Criticism in Philosophy and Science

Dariusz Kubok

Uzyskaj dostęp

Zakup książkę

ISBN/ISSN:

2353-9445

DOI:

Wydawnictwo:

Uniwersytet Śląski

Rok wydania:

2015

Liczba stron:

284

XML:ISBN/ISSN:

ONIX MARC21

Bibliografia:

. Folia Philosophica. Vol. 34. Special issue. Forms of Criticism in Philosophy and Science. Red. Kubok, Dariusz . Katowice: Uniwersytet Śląski, 2015, 284 s. ISSN 2353-9445

Bibliografia refWorks:

RT Book, Whole

SR Electronic(1)

A2 Kubok, D.

T1 Folia Philosophica. Vol. 34. Special issue. Forms of Criticism in Philosophy and Science

PB Uniwersytet Śląski

PP Katowice

YR 2015

Bibliografia BibTex:

@Book{ 157533, author = "", editor = "Kubok, Dariusz", title = "Folia Philosophica. Vol. 34. Special issue. Forms of Criticism in Philosophy and Science", publisher = "Uniwersytet Śląski", year = "2015", address = "Katowice", issn = "2353-9445" }

Bibliografia endNote:

TY - BOOK

AU -

ED - Kubok, Dariusz

TI - Folia Philosophica. Vol. 34. Special issue. Forms of Criticism in Philosophy and Science

PB - Uniwersytet Śląski

CY - Katowice

PY - 2015

ER -

Netografia (standard APA):

. Red. Kubok, Dariusz. Folia Philosophica. Vol. 34. Special issue. Forms of Criticism in Philosophy and Science [baza danych online] Katowice: Uniwersytet Śląski, 2015 [dostęp: 23 07 2024]. Dostęp w Ibuk Libra: https://libra.ibuk.pl/reader/folia-philosophica-vol-34-special-issue-forms-of-criticism-in-dariusz-kubok-157533.

filozofia, nauka, krytycyzm, antydogmatyzm, postawa badawcza

Przedłożony czytelnikom tom jest pierwszym supplementary volume czasopisma „Folia Philosophica”. Ma on charakter monograficzny, dotyczy bowiem różnych form krytycyzmu w perspektywie rozwoju nauki i filozofii, ale jest również tomem o c...

Więcej

ISBN/ISSN:

2353-9445

DOI:

Wydawnictwo:

Uniwersytet Śląski

Rok wydania:

2015

Liczba stron:

284

XML:ISBN/ISSN:

ONIX MARC21

Table of ContentsPreface /7
Dariusz Kubok: Comments on the Sources of Greek Philosophical Criticism /9
Sebastian Śpiewak: The Homeric Source of the Category of δόξα. Δοκέω from a Cognitive-Presumptive Perspective: A Presumption on the Present /33
Andrzej J. Noras: “Being Critical,” Meaning What? /61
Tomasz Kubalica: Critical Metaphysics in the Views of Otto Liebmann and Johannes Volkelt /77
Piotr Łaciak: Dogmatism and Criticism in the Conception of Phenomenological Reduction /101
Krzysztof Wieczorek: Why Should We Think Critically? Comments on the Critical Rationalism of Hans Albert /125
Tomasz Pawelec: The Freudian “Hermeneutics of Suspicion” and Historical Source Critique /151
Bogdan Dembiński: Elements of Greek Scepticism in Richard Feynman’s Views on Science /185
Łukasz Sułkowski, Michał Zawadzki: Critical Discourse in Contemporary Management Science /199
Piotr Machura: Luck, Ignorance, and Moral Attitude /231
Piotr Świercz: Contextualism vs. Non-Contextualism in Political Philosophy. A Contribution to the Debateon Criticism in the Political Sciences /251
Radosław Małek: Individualism and the Social Contract as Expressions of the Critical Genesis of the State in Light of the Views of N. Machiavelli and Th. Hobbes /267

DariuszKubok

inthetheoryofknowledge(mostfrequentlytiedwithI.Kant’sdoc-

trineandtheso-calledmCopernicanRevolution”),criticismcanbe

understoodbroadlyjasapositionconsistingintheabilitytoseparate

bothcognizedareasandmethodsofcognition,intheabilitytojudge

andevaluate,aswellasinanemphasisontheanti-dogmaticapproach.

Alreadyinthe19thcentury,Kantiancriticismbegantobedistin-

guishedfromcriticalphilosophy.NeocriticistAloisRiehlinDerPhilos-

ophischeKritizismusmentionstheancientsourcesofcriticismandcites

theviewsoftheEleaticsandDemocritus.Modernscholarsalsotake

upthisproblemanddiscussotherpossiblesourcesofcriticism,agood

exampleofwhichisErnstHeitsch’sbookXenophanesunddieAnfänge

kritischenDenkens.KarlPopperalsogivesmuchattentiontotheidea

ofcriticisminearlyGreekthought,especiallyinBacktothePresocrat-

icsandinthebookTheWorldofParmenides:EssaysonthePresocratic

Enlightenment,publishedpostmortem.Incontrasttomanyhistori-

ansofphilosophy,whotreatearlyGreekthoughtalmostexclusively

ascosmologyandontology,thisthinkerclearlyappreciatesthevalue

oftheepistemologicalreﬂectionpresentinearlyGreekthought.Pop-

per’sviewsareofvaluablehelpinthestudyofGreekcriticismandits

sources,thoughabroaderperspectiveshouldbetakeninrecogniz-

ingthecriticalattitudethanhispreferredpositionofcriticalratio-

nalism.Weshouldalsonotethatinsecondaryliteraturetheproblem

ofcriticismiswidelyanalyzed,butmainlyonthegroundsofphilology,

asliterarycriticism.Forinstance,inreferencetoearlyGreekthought,

itisworthnamingtheworksofA.Ford,16G.Kennedy,17D.A.Russell,18

W.J.Verdenius,

andR.Harriott.

Thus,weshoulddistinguishliterary

AndrewFord,TheOriginsofCriticism.LiteraryCultureandPoeticTheoryinClassical

Greece(Princeton:PrincetonUniversityPress,2002).

17GeorgeAlexanderKennedy,ed.,TheCambridgeHistoryofLiteraryCriticism(Cambridge:

CambridgeUniversityPress,1989).

DonaldA.Russell,CriticisminAntiquity(BerkeleyandLosAngeles:University

ofCaliforniaPress,1981).

WillemJacobVerdenius,mThePrinciplesofGreekLiteraryCriticism,”Mnemosyne36(1983).

20RosemaryHarriott,PoetryandCriticismbeforePlato(London:Methuen,1969).

Brak wyników

Folia Philosophica. Vol. 34. Special issue. Forms of Criticism in Philosophy and Science

Treść książki

Znajdź bibliotekę blisko siebie, i uzyskaj dostęp do ebooka w systemie IBUK Libra