Treść książki
Przejdź do opcji czytnikaPrzejdź do nawigacjiPrzejdź do informacjiPrzejdź do stopki
JakubBrzostowski
TomaszWachowicz
THEANALYSISOFNEGOTIATORS’
PREFERENCECONSISTENCY
ININDIFFERENCE-SURFACEBASEDSCORING
SYSTEM
Abstract
Inthispaperwepresentanewmethodforanalyzingtheconsistency
ofpreferencesofnegotiatorsinbuildingtheirscoringsystemsofnegotiationoffers.
Themethodweproposecanbeusedwhenthepreferencesaredefinedasgeneral
examplesoffullpackageswiththeaccompanyingutilityscore9asitisdoneinthe
NegoManagenegotiationsupportsystemintheconjointanalysisapproach.During
thepreferenceelicitationstagethenegotiatorsidentifytheindifferencesurfaces
(orindifferencesets)towhichtheyalsoassignsamplealternativesandscores.
Theverificationofsuchtheconsistencyofthisassignmentisbasedontheconcept
oftheJaccardindex9thatallowsformeasuringthesimilaritybetweenfuzzysets.Since
weobtainacharacteristicsofequivalencesetsintheformofprobabilitydistributions9
whicharefurthertreatedasfuzzysetmembershipfunctions9wecanusethedistribution
characteristicstocomputetheJaccardindexforeverypairofequivalencesetselicited
fromthenegotiator.Iftheseindexesaretoohigh9thecorrespondingindifferencesets
shouldbereconsideredorintegrated.
Keywords
Negotiationsupport9negotiationoffers’scoringsystem9preferenceelicitation9
indifferencesets9kerneldensityestimation.
Introduction
Intheprocessofmultiplecriteriadecision-making(MCDM)thedecision
makershavetocopewithproblemsofcomparingandevaluatingverymany
(usuallyconflicting)criteria.Suchdecision-makingprocessesinvolve9
dependingonthedecisioncontextoftheproblem9evaluation9prioritization
orselectionofalternatives.AmongmanyMCDMmethodsthemostpopular
