„Philosophy and Canon Law” 2015. Vol. 1: The Family Institution: Identity, Sovereignty, Social Dimension

Andrzej Pastwa

Uzyskaj dostęp

Zakup książkę

ISBN/ISSN:

2451-2141

DOI:

Wydawnictwo:

Uniwersytet Śląski

Rok wydania:

2015

Liczba stron:

270

XML:ISBN/ISSN:

ONIX MARC21

Bibliografia:

. „Philosophy and Canon Law” 2015. Vol. 1: The Family Institution: Identity, Sovereignty, Social Dimension. Red. Pastwa, Andrzej . Katowice: Uniwersytet Śląski, 2015, 270 s. ISSN 2451-2141

Bibliografia refWorks:

RT Book, Whole

SR Electronic(1)

A2 Pastwa, A.

T1 „Philosophy and Canon Law” 2015. Vol. 1: The Family Institution: Identity, Sovereignty, Social Dimension

PB Uniwersytet Śląski

PP Katowice

YR 2015

Bibliografia BibTex:

@Book{ 159440, author = "", editor = "Pastwa, Andrzej", title = "„Philosophy and Canon Law” 2015. Vol. 1: The Family Institution: Identity, Sovereignty, Social Dimension", publisher = "Uniwersytet Śląski", year = "2015", address = "Katowice", issn = "2451-2141" }

Bibliografia endNote:

TY - BOOK

AU -

ED - Pastwa, Andrzej

TI - „Philosophy and Canon Law” 2015. Vol. 1: The Family Institution: Identity, Sovereignty, Social Dimension

PB - Uniwersytet Śląski

CY - Katowice

PY - 2015

ER -

Netografia (standard APA):

. Red. Pastwa, Andrzej. „Philosophy and Canon Law” 2015. Vol. 1: The Family Institution: Identity, Sovereignty, Social Dimension [baza danych online] Katowice: Uniwersytet Śląski, 2015 [dostęp: 22 07 2024]. Dostęp w Ibuk Libra: https://libra.ibuk.pl/reader/philosophy-and-canon-law-2015-vol-1-the-family-institution-identity-andrzej-pastwa-159440.

filozofia, społeczeństwo, człowiek, rodzina, prawo kanoniczne

Periodyk „Philosophy and Canon Law” stanowi otwarte interdyscyplinarne forum wymiany myśli filozofów i prawników (kanonistów), nie wyłączając przedstawicieli innych dyscyplin naukowych. Mierzenie się z problemami podejmowanymi w roczni...

Więcej

ISBN/ISSN:

2451-2141

DOI:

Wydawnictwo:

Uniwersytet Śląski

Rok wydania:

2015

Liczba stron:

270

XML:ISBN/ISSN:

ONIX MARC21

ContentsPart OnePhilosophical ThoughtPavol DancákFamily and Polis. The Socio-Philosophical Legacy of Plato and Aristotle at the Present Time /7
Krzysztof WieczorekThe Family in the Contemporary World. Catholic Social Teaching and Gender /19
Helena HrehováThe Role of the Women in the Development of Human Rights /51
Aneta GawkowskaNew Feminism as a Response to the Modern Crisis of Community /67
Yosyp VereshLove as a Gift of Self. Call to Holiness in Christian Marriage in the Light of Eastern Monasticism /85
Witold KaniaMoral Issues of Advance Directives /103
Part TwoJuridical Canonical ThoughtAndrzej Pastwa“Common Good of Marriage and the Family.” Canonical Reflections /123
Sovereign Family /143
Piotr MajerThe Significance of the Canonical Form of Marriage /157
Effects of Matrimonial Canon Law: Pastoral Aspects /175
Piotr KroczekChurch Teaching on Marriage and Family as an Instruction for the State Legislator in the Context of Poland /199
Lucjan ŚwitoFamily as a Subject of Protection in the State Family Policy /215
Part ThreeReviewsWojciech Góralski, Andrzej Pastwa, Rodzina suwerenna — Kościół domowy. W nurcie współczesnej myśli prawnej Kościoła powszechnego i Kościoła w Polsce — Józef Krzywda /233
Rodzina i polityka. Ed. Elżbieta Szczot — Jacek Szczot /237
Filozofia polska na tle filozofii europejskiej w XX wieku. Ed. Maciej Woźniczka — Marek Rembierz /243
Wojciech Załuski, Game Theory in Jurisprudence — Wiesław Wójcik /249
Joanna Trzópek, Na tropach podmiotu. Między filozoficznym a empirycznym ujęciem podmiotowości — Adam Olszewski /253
Roman Míčka, Znovu jsme se ujali dědictví otců… Konzervativní politický katolicismus v USA na pozadí komparace Michaela Novaka a Patricka Buchanana — Stanislav Přibyl /257
Notes on Contributors /261

PhilosophicalThought

Intoday’ssocietythereisalsoacomparativelylowlevelofaxiologicaland

normativecompetence.Thisisduetothefactthatthevaluesthatwebelievein

andstriveeverydaytoembody,andalsothosethatlieattherootofstandards

ofconduct,aswellasthepracticalarrangements,convictions,andworldviews

arerarelysubjectedtoreﬂectionandcriticaldiscussion.Wedonotthinkabout

themeveryday,wedonottalkaboutthemand,consequently,wearelittleaware

ofthefacthowmuchouropinions,evaluations,choices,anddecisionsdepend

onthestructureandorderofindividualaxiologicalmaps,storedandoperating

partlybelowthethresholdofconsciousness.

Atthesametime,itescapesourattentionthat,atanymoment,through

manynewschannelswhichareusedbymodernsociety,astreamofmessages

comestous,containinglapartfromliterallyexpressedcontentlarichandan

importantaxiologicalcomponent.Littleareweawareofthefactthatatalllevels

ofcommunicationlfromtheintimatetothemassonelwepassnotonlythe

pureinformation,butalsoanumberofelementsthataffectourperceptionofthe

sphereofvalues.However,thisoccursonthemarginsofourobservationﬁeldor

completelyoutsideitsboundaries.Whenweconsciouslyanalyzethecontentof

thereceivedmessages,onlyinexceptionalcases,wedrawattentiontoexploring,

discoveringorcreatingvaluestakingplacethroughthem.Inpractice,theseare

theaxiologicalcomponentsofcontentsassimilatedbyus,whichmoredurably

andeffectivelythantheinformationcontentaffectourattitudes,shapeourown

prioritiesofevaluationandpreferences,andindirectlyareabletogreatlyhelp

tochangetheexistingbeliefs.Itisanaturalandnecessaryprocess,sinceevery

day,whilelivingandexperiencingtherichnessoftheexternalandinternalcon-

tentsﬁllingourlives,weconcentratenotsomuchonanintellectualreﬂection

(exceptforveryfewcases),butonwhatmakesourlifehappyandfulﬁlled,or

onthecontrarylpitifulandmiserable.AFrenchphilosopherEmmanuelLévi-

nasnoticed:“Welivefrom‘goodsoup’,air,light,spectacles,work,ideas,sleep,

etc.Thesearenotobjectsofrepresentations.Welivefromthem.[ł]Theyare

alwaysinacertainmeasurelandeventhehammers,needles,andmachines

arelobjectsofenjoyment,presentingthemselvesto‘taste’[ł].Thesecontents

arelived:theyfeedlife.”7Theseextremelyinsightfulandaccurateobservations

byLévinasconcernnotonlyourcommunicationwithmaterialthings,butalsol

ashenotedlwithideas.Ourattitudetoideas,thoughtsandopinions,whichwe

feedourselveswithorwhichwemeetbyparticipatingindiscussionsandbyas-

similatingthecontentofthepublicationsormediabroadcasts,doesnotrelyon

purelyrationalassimilationandexclusivelyrationalanalysis,butlasLévinas

wrotelwelivefromthem,weexperiencetheircontentsandtheirwayofpublic

presentation,wedelightinthemorwefeelrepugnant,sometimesfearful,un-

7EmanuelLévinas,TotalityandInﬁnity.AnEssayonExteriority,trans.AlphonsoLingis

(Pittsburgh,PA:DuquesneUniversity,2011),110-11.

Brak wyników

„Philosophy and Canon Law” 2015. Vol. 1: The Family Institution: Identity, Sovereignty, Social Dimension

Treść książki

Znajdź bibliotekę blisko siebie, i uzyskaj dostęp do ebooka w systemie IBUK Libra