Treść książki
Przejdź do opcji czytnikaPrzejdź do nawigacjiPrzejdź do informacjiPrzejdź do stopki
inhousing,townplanningandpolitics,andthereby
abstractingfromthespecificsofColdWaroppositions.21
[FIG.5]
Nevertheless,lookingattheTeam10discourse
throughthelensofitsfictitiousEasterngroupshowsthat,
moreoftenthannot,whatfirstappearsascultural
differentiationactuallypointstofundamentalpolitical
differencesinscribedwithinthecontextoftheColdWar.
Forinstance,wemightpointtothepostulate
of“openness”sharedbyallmembersofTeam10,from
Hansen’sideaofOpenFormtotheSmithsons’designs
ofan“opencity.”ThoseversedinEuropeanarthistory
mighthavelinkedthenotionof“openness”toHeinrich
Wölfflin’s“openform”;thoseinterestedinBritishpolitical
philosophymightseeaconnectionwithKarlPopper’s
“opensociety”;thoseacquaintedwithFrenchphilosophy
wouldlooktoHenriBergson’s“opentotalities”;readers
ofpost-structuralismwouldenvisage“openstructures”;
yetotherscouldrelatethisconcepttothe“opening”
ofMarxismafterandagainsttheStalinist“closure,”which
