Treść książki
Przejdź do opcji czytnikaPrzejdź do nawigacjiPrzejdź do informacjiPrzejdź do stopki
regime,butitwasalsoconceptualizedasacontribution
todebatesaboutthedirectionthatmodernizationshould
take.36
Thisambitiontodiscussalternativescenariosfor
socialistmodernization,andhencealternativescenarios
formodernizationofsocialism,wassharedbymostofthe
protagonistsofthisbook.AsŁukaszStanekshows,
Hansen’sLinearContinuousSystemwasacontribution
todebatesconcerningthereformofsocialistgovernance
in1970sPoland.Yugoslavarchitectswerealsorethinking
thecapacityofarchitecturetomobilizethepopulation
towardparticipationinpoliticaldecisions,economic
activitiesandsocialexchangeaccordingtotheprinciples
ofsocialistself-management,andtodevelopitbeyondits
Fordistphase.37ThelanguageofTeam10architecture
wasparticularlysuitableforthistask,andBlockNo.
22inNewBelgrade,asdescribedbyAleksandarKušić,is
acaseinpoint:designedasaninterplayofthefree
articulationofcellsbetweenfixedpoints,thishousing
ensembleoffersasnapshotoftheambitions,and
disappointments,ofanarchitecturedesigned
tobeappropriatedbyitsinhabitants.Similarly,thespatial
flexibilityoftheWorkers’UniversityinZagrebaimed
tohaveapedagogicaleffect:tostimulateworkers’
intellectualandartisticcapacitiesandtheirsocialization
processes,indispensableforadvancedeconomicand
politicalactivities,asRenataMargaretićUrlićandKarin
Šermanshow.TheWorkers’Universitywasoneofmany
proposalsthroughwhichZagrebarchitectsaimed
tosubvertossifiedtypologicalpatternsandbureaucratic
mainstreammodernizationprocedures,asdiscussed
byMarojeMrduljašandTamaraBjažićKlarin.Their
chaptershowsthatsomebuildingsdesignedaccording
totheTeam10principlesofadditivestructureand
functionalflexibilityprovedtobeparticularlysuitable
whenthefinancialshortagesofrealexistingsocialism
allowedonlypartsofthesebuildingstobecompleted.
Thisparadoxicalcommensurabilitybetweenthe
socialiststateandopenmorphologieswasverydifferent
