Rapports Polonais. XXe Congrès International de Droit Comparé

Biruta Lewaszkiewicz-Petrykowska

Uzyskaj dostęp

Zakup książkę

ISBN/ISSN:

978-83-8142-146-1

DOI:

Wydawnictwo:

Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego

Rok wydania:

2018

Liczba stron:

332

XML:ISBN/ISSN:

ONIX MARC21

Bibliografia:

. Rapports Polonais. XXe Congrès International de Droit Comparé. Red. Lewaszkiewicz-Petrykowska, Biruta . Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, 2018, 332 s. ISBN 978-83-8142-146-1

Bibliografia refWorks:

RT Book, Whole

SR Electronic(1)

A2 Lewaszkiewicz-Petrykowska, B.

T1 Rapports Polonais. XXe Congrès International de Droit Comparé

PB Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego

PP Łódź

YR 2018

SN 978-83-8142-146-1

Bibliografia BibTex:

@Book{ 196454, author = "", editor = "Lewaszkiewicz-Petrykowska, Biruta", title = "Rapports Polonais. XXe Congrès International de Droit Comparé", publisher = "Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego", year = "2018", address = "Łódź", isbn = "978-83-8142-146-1" }

Bibliografia endNote:

TY - BOOK

AU -

ED - Lewaszkiewicz-Petrykowska, Biruta

TI - Rapports Polonais. XXe Congrès International de Droit Comparé

PB - Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego

CY - Łódź

PY - 2018

SN - 978-83-8142-146-1

ER -

Netografia (standard APA):

. Red. Lewaszkiewicz-Petrykowska, Biruta. Rapports Polonais. XXe Congrès International de Droit Comparé [baza danych online] Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego, 2018 [dostęp: 03 07 2024]. Dostęp w Ibuk Libra: https://libra.ibuk.pl/reader/rapports-polonais-xxe-congres-international-de-droit-compare-biruta-lewaszkiewicz-196454.

XXth International Congress of Comparative Law. Fukuoka, 22–28 VII 2018

Spis treści

Więcej

ISBN/ISSN:

978-83-8142-146-1

DOI:

Wydawnictwo:

Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego

Rok wydania:

2018

Liczba stron:

332

XML:ISBN/ISSN:

ONIX MARC21

Michał Wojewoda, Professor of Law, University of Łódź – Conditions of the recognition of the civil status of transsexual and transgender people in Poland7
Tomasz Sokołowski, Professor of Law, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Andrzej Mączyński, Professor of Law, Jagiellonian University, Kraków – Multicultural challenges in family law (Poland)27
Monika Namysłowska, Professor of Law, University of Łódź, Agnieszka Jabłonowska, PhD researcher – Information obligations and disinformation of consumers including negotiation (Poland)57
Janusz Jankowski, Professor of Law, University of Łódź, Sławomir Cieślak, Professor of Law, University of Łódź, Maciej Muliński, Doctor of Law, University of Łódź, Tomasz Strumiłło, Doctor of Law, University of Łódź – The anti-suit injunctions in arbitral and judicial procedures (Poland)93
Mariola Lemonnier, Professeur à l’Université de Warmia et Mazury, Olsztyn – Les groupes des sociétés (Pologne)107
Ewa Bagińska, Professor of Law, University of Gdańsk – Legal regulation of crowdfunding in Poland123
Beata Giesen, Professor of Law, University of Łódź – Security rights on intellectual property (Poland)137
Łukasz Pisarczyk, Professor of Law, University of Warsaw, Dagmara Skupień, Professor of Law, University of Łódź – The role of collective bargaining in the polish labour law151
Maria Dragun-Gertner, Professor of Law, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Toruń, Zuzanna Pepłowska-Dąbrowska, Doctor of Law, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Toruń – Legal aspects of cruises (Poland)173
Katarzyna Łasak, Doctor hab., University of Gdańsk – The fight against poverty and the right to development in Poland183
Janusz Trzciński, Professor of Law, University of Warsaw, Michał Szwast, Doctor of Law, University of Warsaw – Formal and informal amendments to the constitution (Poland)217
Zbigniew Kmieciak, Professor of Law, University of Łódź, Joanna Wegner-Kowalska, Doctor of Law, University of Łódź – The deference concept in the polish administrative courts adjudication245
Jarosław Utrat-Milecki, Professor of Law, University of Warsaw – Juvenile delinquency under recent developments in children’ rights. Child as perpetrator and victim of criminal offence (Poland)261
Maria Rogacka-Rzewnicka, Professor of Law, University of Warsaw, Piotr Girdwoyń, Professor of Law, University of Warsaw – Confidentiality of correspondence with counsel as requirement of a fair trial (Poland)279
Monika Wałachowska, Professor of Law, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Toruń – Legal aspects of genetic testing regarding insurance and employment (Poland)301
Małgorzata Król, Professor of Law, University of Łódź – The legal services market and conveyancing (Poland)319

TomaszSokołowski,AndrzejMączyński

thecentralpartin1815wascreatedthe“KrólestwoPolskie”(Kingdomof

Poland-capitolWarsaw-withRussian“car”asPolishKing)andtherewasleft

-withsameamendments-thePolish,muchmoreliberalversionofNapoleon

Code(itwascalled“CivilCodeofKingdomofPoland”).Thesecond,north-

eastpartoutsideofriverofBug(currentLithuania,Byelorussiaandwestpart

ofUkraine)wassimplyincorporatedtoRussiaandtherewereintroducedthe

systemofRussianlaw.

Allthelegalsystemsadmitteddivorce.

AfterIWorldWartheSecond“Respublica”ofPoland(IIRP)eventually

reachedin1918theindependencehavingahalfofformerterritory.

Althoughthelawofobligations,commerciallawandprocedurelawwere

successfullyuniﬁed,10thefamilylawregulationwasanextremelycomplicated

mixtureof4aboveindicatedlegalsystemsinformeroccupantszonesandseveral

religiousregulationsofeachofseveralconfessionswhichcoexistedinPoland.

Withthisreasontheuniﬁcationoffamilylawwereenormouslycomplicatedand

theprojectofUniﬁedFamilyLawfrom1929wasrejectedbyParliament.As

aresultontheareaoffamilylawallofthese4legalsystemssurvivedandwerein

forceinthisfourPolishterritoriessince1946afterWorldWarII.

WithinthelongperiodofsocialiststateofPolishPeopleRepublic(PRL,

1945-1990)theladingminorityofsocialists,supportedbyRussiaweretryingto

establishveryoppressivefamilylawforallreligiousgroupsofsociety.Practically

familylawcompletelyignoredthereligiousconvictionsofcitizens,founding

unreasonableassumptionthatPolishsocietywasanatheisticgroupofpeople.For

examplethereligiousformofmarriagewasallowedonlyaftercelebrationofthe

laymarriages(secularform),uponsanctionof3yearsofpunishmentofprisonfor

thepriestwhowouldhavecelebratedit.

HoweverontheotherhandtheConstitutionofPRLformallyguaranteedthe

rightsofparentsofbringuptheirchildreninaccordancewiththeirownreligious

convictions.

After1990theindependentPolishstatedidsomesuitableamendmentsof

F.G.C.forprotectionthefreedomofconscience,butsomesmallinappropriate

remindersstillsurvived.

3.Protectionofthebestinterestofthechild

ThePolishfamilylawhasalongtraditionofprotectionofthebestinterest

ofthechild,whichstartedwiththeActonadoptionon19thofJuly1939.Now

thejurisprudence’sdeﬁnitionrecognizesthewelfareofthechildasan“optimal

10Ontheareaoflawonlythelawofobligationsandcommerciallawweresuccessfullyuniﬁed

in1933/1934.AswelltheuniﬁedcivilprocedurewasintroducedbyC.C.P.from1930.

Brak wyników

Rapports Polonais. XXe Congrès International de Droit Comparé

Treść książki

Znajdź bibliotekę blisko siebie, i uzyskaj dostęp do ebooka w systemie IBUK Libra