Treść książki

Przejdź do opcji czytnikaPrzejdź do nawigacjiPrzejdź do informacjiPrzejdź do stopki
MulticulturalchallengesinFamilyLaw(Poland)
31
configurationofelementsonthestateofafairsregardingachild,thatisachild’s
interest.”
AswellPolishStateputforwardin1978theveryfirstdraftoftheUN
ConventionontheRightoftheChild.11Nosolutioninfamilycasesevengiven
bytheECtHR,ifitslevelofprotectionofchildwelfareislowerthanthePolish
standardwillnotinfluencePolishfamilylaw.
4.Theoverallattitudetowardsnormativeandsocialdiversity
inPolishjurisdiction
Thesubstanceoffamilylawrelationsiscontainedwithinafixedframework.
LegalnormsoffamilylawofF.G.C.areabsolutelyrequired(legaldutyto
observance).Howeverwithinthatframework,thepersonsconstitutingafamily
(marriage,singleparentfamilyorconcubinagewithachild)havethefreedomof
choice.Theymaybehavetowardseachotherintheirownmanner,accordinglyto
theirsreligiousorphilosophicalconvictions.Thisfreedomisprotectedaswellby
substantivecivilrightsbyCiv.C.
5.Other/alternativenormativesystems
Becauseofreligiousdiferentiationappearstheseverallegalconventions
wereprepared,concludedandratifiedbetweenthePolishStateandtheleaders
ofallreligiousminorities-notonlywiththegroupofCatholics.Allthese
groupreceivedthefullscalecompetenceofarrangementofalegalceremonyof
constructingamarriagewhichareefectiveontheareaofFamilyLaw.Inaddition
allreligiousgroupsreceivedvarioussuitablelegalregulationontheareaofprivate
andpubliclaw.
6.StanceofPolishjurisdictiontowarddiversity
Afterseveralcenturiesexperienceofexperienceoffullscaletoleranceand
coexistenceofvariousreligion,culturalandphilosophicalgroupsofoursociety,
Polandeventuallyimpliedthemodelofelasticandonlyoneverygeneralframe
offamilyinstitutions.
11T.Hammarberg,TheBestinterestofthechildwhatitmeansandwhatitdemands
fromadult,[in:]Children’sRightsandHumanDevelopment,ed.J.C.Willems,Antwerp-Oxford-
Portland2010,p.582.