Treść książki

Przejdź do opcji czytnikaPrzejdź do nawigacjiPrzejdź do informacjiPrzejdź do stopki
suchmeansascontinuousreflectiononaction,raisingquestionsandevalua-
tingtheemergingtheorieswiththeuseofpersonalexperienceandthereflec-
tionsofotherteachers.
Inthiscase,whatisneededisareorientationofteachers’beliefsandroles.
First,teachersneedtobecomeeffectivemediators.Second,theyneedtobe
abletotakeonsuchrolesasadvisors,facilitators,consultants,co-
comunicators,partnersandjointproblemsolvers.Third,teachersneedto
becomeawareofthevalueoflearningstrategies,whichprovedtobeanef-
fectivemeansfordevelopingstudents’autonomy.Whenincorporatingcriti-
calthinkingintotheclassrooms,itisimportantforteacherstofocusnotonly
onhelpingstudentsbecomemoreawareofinformationbutalsoonbecoming
reflectiveparticipantsinaglobalpartnershipofinvolvementinseekingsolu-
tions.Sometimesteachersusedifferentteachingmethodsandthinkthatthey
arethereforeemployingdifferentclassroompractices.Atthesametimetheir
actualclassroompracticesreflectapoolofcommoninstructionalbehaviors
(Richards1990:119).Thismayimplythatteachers’beliefsaboutthenature
oflanguageandlanguagelearningareofprimaryimportance.However,pre-
sentinglearnerswithasetoflanguagetrainingmaterialsandmakingthem
practicevariouslearningstrategiesisnotsufficientenoughtoraisetheir
awareness.AsBruner(1966:53)writes:“Instructionisaprovisionalstate
thathasitsobjecttomakethelearnerorproblem-solverself-sufficientOther-
wisetheresultofinstructionistocreateaformofmasterythatiscontingent
upontheperpetualpresenceofateacher”.
Thelackofreflectiveawarenessamongteachersinthetimeofgreaterre-
sponsibilityshiftfromteacherstostudentsmaybeaveryseriousfactorcon-
tributingtothefailureofeffectivelearning.Sometimes,eventeacherswho
areawareoftheongoingchangesrefusetochangetheirteachingroutines.As
Appel(1995:xiv)writes:“Anemphasisonchangedoesnotnecessarilycom-
binewellwithoneonpractice.Thepracticingteacher’sresistancetoeduca-
tionalchangehasoftenbeenthesubjectofcomplaint”.Theproblemmaybe
evenbiggertakingintoconsiderationthefactthatmanyteachersareoften
convincedthattheyare‘doingtheirjob’.Thereisadifferencebetween:‘Ido
notknow’and‘IthinkIknow’.Iftheteachersagreetosubmergeintothe
system,iftheyconsenttobeingdefinedbyothers’viewsofwhattheyare
supposedtobe,theygiveupthefreedomtosee,tounderstand,andtosignify
forhimself/herself.Iftheyareimmersedandimpermeable,theycanhardly
stirotherstodefinethemselvesasindividuals.Ifontheotherhand,theteach-
10