Treść książki
Przejdź do opcji czytnikaPrzejdź do nawigacjiPrzejdź do informacjiPrzejdź do stopki
INTRODUCTION
meessentialdińerenceintreatingresearchproblemsisaresultofcompar-
ingtheachievementsofscienceofwidelyunderstoodEuropeanculturewith
theteachingsoftheFarEast.Systemicapproachdominatedintheteachings
oftheFarEast,consistinginrecognitionoftheprobleminthelightofthe
whole1.Despiteutterlydińerentmethodologicalapproaches,todayweare
witnessingthedevelopmentoftheconceptofanintegratedcognitionmod-
elcalledholistic-evolutionary.misapproachassociatesstreamofthought,
knownasthesystemicviewoftheworld,withawiderevolutionism.Itispos-
sibletonoticeacleartendencyofdissolvingtheanalytical-intellectualmodel
ofcognition,characteristicforEuropeanculturewithanintuitively-synthet-
icmodel-characteristicforthecultureoftheEast.metheoryrecognizes
thattheanalytical-intellectualmodelismoreusefulformappingthestruc-
tureofreality,enablingtogettoknowitinstaticview.Ontheotherhand,
theintuitively-syntheticmodelismoreusefulformappingthedevelopment
changesofthestructureofreality,therebyprovidingknowledgeaboutitin
dynamicview.Bothmodelsofscientificcognitionarecomplementary2.Ho-
listic-evolutionaryparadigmwasatthebaseoftheresearchresultsofwhich
arepresentedinthispaper.
Systemiccurrentrepresentedintheworkischaracterizedbythepursuit
ofintegrationofsciencebyovercomingtheinterdisciplinary3barriers,inthis
caseexistinginparticularbetweenlawandeconomics,aswellasbetweenlaw
andtheorganizationandmanagement.mesystemicmethodcanbeusedto
1
Broadersee:H.Adamkiewicz-Drwiłło,Współczesnametodologianaukekonomicznych,
Toruń2008,p.93.
2
Moreonthescientificcognitionmodelssee:ibidem,p.80ń.
3
J.D.Rosnay,Makroskop.Próbawizjiglobalnej,Warszawa1982,pp.120-121;M.J.Hatch,
Teoriaorganizacji,Warszawa2002,p.50.
