Safety monitoring in maintenance management systems for railway vehicles

Marek Sitarz, Rafał Wachnik

Uzyskaj dostęp

Zakup książkę

ISBN/ISSN:

978-83-65621-85-6

DOI:

Wydawnictwo:

Wydawnictwo Naukowe Akademii WSB

Rok wydania:

2020

Liczba stron:

128

XML:ISBN/ISSN:

ONIX MARC21

Bibliografia:

Sitarz, Marek; Wachnik, Rafał. Safety monitoring in maintenance management systems for railway vehicles. Red. . : Wydawnictwo Naukowe Akademii WSB, 2020, 128 s. ISBN 978-83-65621-85-6

Bibliografia refWorks:

RT Book, Whole

SR Electronic(1)

A1 Sitarz, M.

A1 Wachnik, R.

T1 Safety monitoring in maintenance management systems for railway vehicles

PB Wydawnictwo Naukowe Akademii WSB

YR 2020

SN 978-83-65621-85-6

Bibliografia BibTex:

@Book{ 239311, author = "Sitarz, Marek and Wachnik, Rafał", editor = "", title = "Safety monitoring in maintenance management systems for railway vehicles", publisher = "Wydawnictwo Naukowe Akademii WSB", year = "2020", address = "", isbn = "978-83-65621-85-6" }

Bibliografia endNote:

TY - BOOK

AU - Sitarz, Marek

AU - Wachnik, Rafał

ED -

TI - Safety monitoring in maintenance management systems for railway vehicles

PB - Wydawnictwo Naukowe Akademii WSB

CY -

PY - 2020

SN - 978-83-65621-85-6

ER -

Netografia (standard APA):

Sitarz, Marek; Wachnik, Rafał. Safety monitoring in maintenance management systems for railway vehicles [baza danych online] : Wydawnictwo Naukowe Akademii WSB, 2020 [dostęp: 22 07 2024]. Dostęp w Ibuk Libra: https://libra.ibuk.pl/reader/safety-monitoring-in-maintenance-management-systems-for-railway-marek-sitarz-rafal-wachnik-239311.

Fragment recenzji Prof. dr. hab. inż. Andrzeja Lewińskiego:

„Publikacja w istotny sposób porusza problematykę bezpiecznego utrzymania taboru kolejowego w warunkach obowiązujących w Polsce, odwołuje się przy tym do aktualnych i history...

Więcej

ISBN/ISSN:

978-83-65621-85-6

DOI:

Wydawnictwo:

Wydawnictwo Naukowe Akademii WSB

Rok wydania:

2020

Liczba stron:

128

XML:ISBN/ISSN:

ONIX MARC21

1. Introduction3
2. Safety in transport8
2.1 Safety performance regarding different transport modes8
2.1.1 Prologue8
2.1.2 Safety performance regarding different transport modes9
2.2 Railway safety performance in Poland for 201811
2.3 Common Occurrence Reporting concept (COR)20
2.2.1 Summary20
2.3.1 Subject matter21
2.3.2 Scope21
2.3.3 Definitions24
2.3.4 Reporting scheme and timing28
2.3.5 Data collection, storage and analysis30
2.4 Analysis of the state of knowledge32
2.3.6 Proposed next steps32
2.3.7 Summary32
3. Intergrated SAFETY management system in the railway transport34
3.1 General characteristics of the railway transport34
3.2 Actors subject to risk assessment in rail35
3.2.1 Carrier and the infrastructure manager35
3.2.2 User of siding35
3.2.2.1 Acquisition of a railway siding railway safety certificate [41]36
3.2.2.2 The origins of taking safety certificate siding36
3.2.2.3 Advantages and disadvantages of taking the siding safety certificate36
3.2.2.4 Legal requirements for SMS with respect to the railway siding37
3.2.2.5 Summary38
3.2.3 Railway manufacturer39
3.2.4 Entity responsible for maintenance (including maintenance workshops) [118], [119]40
3.3 Integrationan of management systems42
3.3.1 Management Systems in rail42
3.3.2 Examples of systems integration management [121]43
3.4 The institutional and legal system46
4. Characteristics of system operation maintenance management in rail transport51
4.1 Definition and description of the process approach51
4.1.1 Identification of the process51
4.1.2 Determination of the links between the processes52
4.1.3 Term for the processes responsible52
4.2 Development of the system53
4.3 Process improvement53
4.4 Process map53
4.5 Requirements and assumptions Management System maintenance54
4.5.1 Directive 2008/110 / EC as regards requirements MMS57
4.5.2 Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) – temporary solution58
4.5.3 Regulation EC No. 445/2011 – target solutions59
4.6 Risk assessment SMS and MMS61
4.6.1 Risk assessment in transport61
4.6.2 The risk assessment in rail transport65
4.6.3 Commission Regulation (EC) No 402/201365
4.7 Diagnostics in rail69
5. Development of a model system maintenance management and methods of analysis parameters RAMS rail vehicles78
5.1 Introduction to risk assessment management system maintenance78
5.2 Assessment of operational risk according to a common method of risk evaluation and assessment (CSM-RA)78
5.3 Assessment of operational risk in accordance with the requirements of the Regulation 445/201180
5.4 Assessment of operational risk in the proposed MMS81
5.4.1 Description of the method81
5.4.1.1 Basic rules81
5.4.1.2 Stages of risk management in MMS82
5.4.2 Mathematical description on the risk management model83
5.5 Method used for evaluation85
5.6 Identification of critical technical system in railway vehicles86
5.6.1 Introduction86
5.6.2 Analysis of the causes of the accidents of the original railway87
5.6.2.1 Analysis of the share of railway technical accidents89
5.6.2.2 Analysis of the causes of the accidents of the original railway91
5.7 Maintenance management system model of rail vehicles92
5.7.1 Map processes made for the needs of the ECM92
5.7.2 List of procedures MMS92
5.6.2.3 Analysis of the share of railway technical accidents92
5.8 Rams analysis of the parameters of rail vehicles99
6. Validation of the model system maintenance management and analysis of rams parameters of rail vehicles104
6.1 Applicaion maintenance management system model to the actor in charge of maintenance (ecm) freight wagons105
6.2 Application developed algorithm to analyse rams in charge of maintenance (ecm) freight wagons105
6.1.1 Maintenance Management System 2.1.1105
6.1.2 Operational risk assessment105
6.2.1 Freight wagon type 412W – RAMS indicators106
6.2.1.1 Type 412W – RAMS – common to the group by year110
6.2.1.2 Type 412W – RAMS – for individual vehicles (25 worst wagons)111
6.2.2 Wagon type 412W – RAMS indicator – conclusions113
6.3. Conclusions from the analysis of the use of multimedia in RAMS115
7. Safety culture116
7.1 Preface116
7.2 Place of safety culture in EU documents117
7.3 Railways application concept118
8. Summary121
9. Bibliography122

–aviationisbuiltonproceduresfornearlyeveryaspectoftransport,railwaysalsohaveastrong

internalregulationsbackboneforoperation,lately(fromaround2004)alsogoingintothedirection

ofmanagementsystemsforsafetyandmaintenance.

‒Accessfornon-professionaloperatorstothetransportinfrastructureistheonlyonewithopen

accessfor“amateur”operators(drivers)tothesameinfrastructurethatprofessionalsoperate,with

slightresemblanceinmaritime(butsigniﬁcantdiﬀerencesinsizeofvessels).Inaviationsmall

airplanes,usuallyoperatedbynonprofessionalpilots,canoperatetoacertainﬂightleveland

inrailwaysthereareonlyprofessionaldrivers.

‒Allofthesediﬀerencesandfarmore,likethelevelofthesafetycultureoftransportuserswill

eventuallyhaveitsinfluenceonsafetyperformance.

2.1.2Safetyperformanceregardingdifferenttransportmodes

EuropeanUnion’sAgencyforRailways(EUARortheAgency)startedtocomparesafetyperformance

betweendiﬀerenttransportmodesacoupleofyearsago.Themostuptodatecomparisonareshown

inFigure4[36].Asonecanseefromit,aviationisstillthesafestmodeoftransportregardingthe

numberoffatalitiesandtraveldistance,whiletherailwaysremainthesafestlandtransportmode.

Figure4FatalitiesperbillionpassengerkilometresfordifferentmodesoftransportintheEU(2010-2014)3[36]

Inthefollowinganalysisauthorsfocusedonroadandrailwaytransportsastheyarethemost

commonandveryaccessibleforpassengers,especiallyregardingdistancesupto500km.General

SafetyperformancevaluesforeachtransportmodesaregiveninTable1.

Table1Generalsafetyperformancedataforroadtransportandrailways

for2016)

Transportmode(data

Roadtransport

Railways

/incidents

Numberofaccidents

33,664/406,622

581/837

injured/injured

Numberoffatalities/seriously

3,026/12,109/40,766

169/94/-

&2015)

Economiccost(2014

PLN48.2bln–2015[36a]

EUR153.9mln-2014

Onecanclearlyseethatthediﬀerenceindataisstaggeringandfavouringrailways,evenhaving

inmindthediﬀerenceinanumberofmillionpassenger-kmdonebyeachmode(in2016[15a]–292

forrailwaysand390forroadtransport).RegardinglandtransportinPoland,theauthorscompared

numberoffatalitieswiththeoperationalworkinrailwayandinroadtransport,thecomparison

isshownbelow.

Table2Comparisonofsafetyperformanceinlandtransport(numberoffatalitiesandoperationalwork)4

Accidentmeasureforfreighttransport

Accidentmeasureforpassengertransport

year2016

0,010

0,157

Roadtransport

Brak wyników

Safety monitoring in maintenance management systems for railway vehicles

Treść książki

Znajdź bibliotekę blisko siebie, i uzyskaj dostęp do ebooka w systemie IBUK Libra