The Judiciary of Diocesan Vicars in the Later Roman Empire

Jacek Wiewiorowski

Uzyskaj dostęp

ISBN/ISSN:

978-83-232-2925-4

DOI:

Wydawnictwo:

Uniwersytet im.Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu

Rok wydania:

2015

Liczba stron:

396

XML:ISBN/ISSN:

ONIX MARC21

Bibliografia:

Wiewiorowski, Jacek. The Judiciary of Diocesan Vicars in the Later Roman Empire. Red. . : Uniwersytet im.Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu, 2015, 396 s. ISBN 978-83-232-2925-4

Bibliografia refWorks:

RT Book, Whole

SR Electronic(1)

A1 Wiewiorowski, J.

T1 The Judiciary of Diocesan Vicars in the Later Roman Empire

PB Uniwersytet im.Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu

YR 2015

SN 978-83-232-2925-4

Bibliografia BibTex:

@Book{ 154888, author = "Wiewiorowski, Jacek", editor = "", title = "The Judiciary of Diocesan Vicars in the Later Roman Empire", publisher = "Uniwersytet im.Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu", year = "2015", address = "", isbn = "978-83-232-2925-4" }

Bibliografia endNote:

TY - BOOK

AU - Wiewiorowski, Jacek

ED -

TI - The Judiciary of Diocesan Vicars in the Later Roman Empire

PB - Uniwersytet im.Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu

CY -

PY - 2015

SN - 978-83-232-2925-4

ER -

Netografia (standard APA):

Wiewiorowski, Jacek. The Judiciary of Diocesan Vicars in the Later Roman Empire [baza danych online] : Uniwersytet im.Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu, 2015 [dostęp: 31 07 2024]. Dostęp w Ibuk Libra: https://libra.ibuk.pl/reader/the-judiciary-of-diocesan-vicars-in-the-later-roman-empire-jacek-wiewiorowski-154888.

vicars of dioceses, judiciary, Later Roman Empire, evolution of the judiciary of diocesan vicars, evolutionary psychology

The study focuses on vicars of dioceses (vicarius dioeceseos) of the Later Roman Empire and their judiciary capacity, which occupied one of the principal places in their duties. It is the first attempt to present the issue in scholarly research. T...

Więcej

ISBN/ISSN:

978-83-232-2925-4

DOI:

Wydawnictwo:

Uniwersytet im.Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu

Rok wydania:

2015

Liczba stron:

396

XML:ISBN/ISSN:

ONIX MARC21

Preface10
Abbreviations14
Sources14
1. Preliminary issues16
1.1. The object and aims of the work and research methodology16
1.2. Sources and literature of the subject31
1.2.1. Legal sources31
1.2.2. Non-legal sources36
1.2.3. Literature of the subject38
2. The position of diocesan vicars in administrative structures of the Empire40
2.1. General remarks40
2.2. The Titulature of diocese administrators and diocesan organization47
2.2.1. General remarks47
2.2.2. Titulature of vicars – detailed remarks and changes in the organization of dioceses before 53553
2.3.3. Separate status of individual diocesan administrators78
3. Organization of judicature within the office of diocesan vicars89
3.1. General issues89
3.2. The officium of diocesan vicars95
4. Judiciary of the vicars in the light of legal sources110
4.1. Imperial constitutions preserved in Codex Theodosianus of 438 and novella Marciani 1 of 450110
4.2. Imperial constitutions preserved in Codex Iustinianus of 534 and novella Iustiniani 23 of 535215
5. Judiciary of vicars in the light of non-legal sources237
5.1. Iconographic sources237
5.2. Literary and epigraphic sources257
6. Territorial administration after Justinian’s reforms282
7. Conclusions289
List of maps, tables and figures308
Bibliography310
Index locorum383

Theneedtotakesocio-biologicalperspectiveintoaccountinhistoricalin-

vestigationshadalreadybeenrightlynotedoverthreedecadesago.Asoneof

itsadvocateswrote,HForhistorians,thisisthecommontheme-wemight

understandthepresentbyunderstandingourwrittenpast.Darwiniansadd

thisvariation-wemightunderstandthewrittenpastbyunderstandingour

evolutionarypast.”22Thedemandthatatleastsomeofthefindingsofsociobi-

ologyandrelatedcurrentsbeconsideredisadvancedinjurisprudenceaswell,

forexamplewithrespecttotheoriginsofandenactmentoflaw23,althoughit

hastobeadmittedthatsuchanapproachgivesrisetocontroversy.24

___

____

___

22Betzig(1991):140.Ontheapplicationofevolutionaryconceptsinsocialsciencesseee.g.

Alock(2001):esp.189-216;Zywicki(2000);Barkow(2006);Stone,Lurquin(2009):esp.11-24,

167-211;Ploeger(2010);Roberts(2012);Scheidel(2013).Aboldattempttotakeevolutionist

conceptsintoaccountintheanalysisofdevelopmentanddeclineoftheRomanstatewasmade

byFrost(2010).Sincehisanalysisissuperficial,sociobiologicalconceptsshouldbeaddressed-

criticallyaswell-byhistoriansandRomanstudiesexperts.Inthisrespectseee.g.Scheidel

(1996);Pankiewicz(2001);Scheidel(2009a)and(2009b).Thisisbynomeansaneasytask,due

tothedifficultiesintransposinghypothesesadvancedbyvariouscurrentsofevolutionism.See

e.g.Nettle(2010).

23Cf.Beckstrom(1991);Elliott(1997);Zywicki(1999);Kuklin(2004);Jones(2005);Jones,

Goldsmith(2005);Zywicki(2007);Hoffman(2008);Zamboni(2008);Dyevre(2010);Hołyst

(2010);Zamboni(2010);Fruehwald(2011);Gommer(2012).WithrespecttoPolishlegaltheory,

asynthesisofviewswhichsupportthisresearchperspectivewaspresentedbyZałuski(2009).

TheGruterInstituteforLawandBehavioralResearchsupportsstudieswhichincludeevolu-

tionistconceptsinjurisprudence-seehttp://www.gruterinstitute.org.Theseissuesarealso

addressedbySocietyforEvolutionaryAnalysisinLaw(SEAL),https://www4.vander

bilt.edu/seal/.InPoland,themilieuisgatheredaroundtheCopernicusCenterforInterdisci-

plinaryStudiesinCracow,http://www.copernicuscenter.edu.pl/homeen/(relatedquestions

weredisucussedinpaperpublishedintheCracowStudiesinPhilosophyandLaw,especiallynos

4-5);thewebsiteoffersextensiveinformationandlinkstoworksapplyingthoseconceptsin

jurisprudenceandPolishSocietyforHumanandEvolutionStudies(PolskieTowarzystwo

NaukoCzłowiekuiEwolucji-PTNCE),http://ptnce.pl.Seealsotherecentpapersin

Zumbansen,Callies(2011):esp.pp.248-294.

24InPolishwritingsseeesp.Brożek(2010);(2011)and(2012):181-248(setagainstother

conceptsontheessenceandoriginsoflaw),withextensivebibliography.Brożekdoes

acknowledgetheachievementsofnaturalsciencesinunderstandingtheessenceofhumanity,

butalsoveryaptlyindicatessomeoftheirlimitations.Ultimately,heoptsforthecompromise

presentedbyMichaelTomasello,aconceptknownasmutualism(whichpresupposesrecipro-

caldependencyofbiologyandcultureinhumanevolution,withemphasisonthelatterfactor).

SeeTomasello(2002)and(2009).Brożek,relyingchieflyonlogicalreasoning,comestoacon-

clusionthatHitwouldbedifficulttoclaimthatthereexistsaclearlyidentifiablebiological

foundationofmoral(andlegal)norms)”;quotedafter:Brożek(2012):211.Althoughthedis-

quisitiondoesnotlacklogicalcohesion,theyhaveonemajorflaw:theyfailtomentionthe

findingsofexperimentalstudiesconductedbyresearchersassociatedwithcurrentsrelatedto

sociobiology,whichcorroboratetheirprincipaltheses,andquotesonlyselectedstudiesand

interpretationswhichunderminethosetheses(chieflybyM.Tomasello,whichwereconcerned

Brak wyników

The Judiciary of Diocesan Vicars in the Later Roman Empire

Treść książki

Znajdź bibliotekę blisko siebie, i uzyskaj dostęp do ebooka w systemie IBUK Libra