European Union Private International Labour Law (EU PILL)

Andrzej Marian Świątkowski

Uzyskaj dostęp

Zakup książkę

ISBN/ISSN:

978-83-233-3172-8

DOI:

Wydawnictwo:

Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego

Rok wydania:

2012

Liczba stron:

346

XML:ISBN/ISSN:

ONIX MARC21

Bibliografia:

Świątkowski, Andrzej Marian. European Union Private International Labour Law (EU PILL). Red. . Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, 2012, 346 s. ISBN 978-83-233-3172-8

Bibliografia refWorks:

RT Book, Whole

SR Electronic(1)

A1 Świątkowski, A.M.

T1 European Union Private International Labour Law (EU PILL)

PB Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego

PP Kraków

YR 2012

SN 978-83-233-3172-8

Bibliografia BibTex:

@Book{ 40864, author = "Świątkowski, Andrzej Marian", editor = "", title = "European Union Private International Labour Law (EU PILL)", publisher = "Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego", year = "2012", address = "Kraków", isbn = "978-83-233-3172-8" }

Bibliografia endNote:

TY - BOOK

AU - Świątkowski, Andrzej Marian

ED -

TI - European Union Private International Labour Law (EU PILL)

PB - Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego

CY - Kraków

PY - 2012

SN - 978-83-233-3172-8

ER -

Netografia (standard APA):

Świątkowski, Andrzej Marian. European Union Private International Labour Law (EU PILL) [baza danych online] Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, 2012 [dostęp: 08 05 2024]. Dostęp w Ibuk Libra: https://libra.ibuk.pl/reader/european-union-private-international-labour-law-eu-pill-andrzej-marian-swiatkowski-40864.

European Union, private international law, labour law

e-ISBN: 978-83-233-8389-5

The European Union as an area of freedom, security and justice has created a community which adheres to unified laws. In matters regulated by labour law (individual and collective) as well as social security law, t...

Więcej

ISBN/ISSN:

978-83-233-3172-8

DOI:

Wydawnictwo:

Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego

Rok wydania:

2012

Liczba stron:

346

XML:ISBN/ISSN:

ONIX MARC21

Introductory Comments 10
Part I. Preliminary Part12
Chapter 1. The subject of international private labour law 14
Chapter 2. An attempt to erradicate any national labour law conflicts within EU private international labour regulations 26
Part II. Conflicts of law of individual labour law in the light of the Rome Convention of June 19, 1980 and Regulation of the European Parliament and the Council of the European Communities No. 593/2008 of June 17, 2008 on the law applicable to contractual obligations (“Rome I”)50
Chapter 1. Rome Convention 50
§ 1. Preparation of the Rome Convention 50
§ 2. The approach of the Rome Convention to the other provisions of private international law rules regulating conflicts of law in obligations 59
§ 3. The scope of the Rome Convention 64
§ 1. Freedom of choice 90
Chapter 2. Resolving confl icts of substantive labour law in the Rome Convention (“Rome I”) 91
§ 2. Law in the absence of choice 111
§ 3. Determinants in matters regulated by individual employment law118
§ 4. Mandatory rules 130
§ 5. Scope of applicable law for employment contracts 133
Chapter 3. Converting the Rome Convention into Regulation No. 593/2008 (“Rome I”) 141
Part III. Conflict of law issues in individual labour law in light of the Regulation (EC) No. 864/2007 of the European Parliament and the Council of the EU ( July 11, 2007), concerning law applicable to Non-Contractual Obligations (“Rome II”)154
Introduction156

AnattempttoerradicateanynationallabourlawconﬂictswithinEUprivateinternational...

notlegallybinding,andtheirvalidityissolelyduetotheirnature,whichclearly

reﬂectstheEnglishterm“agentlemen’sagreement,”insupportoftheprovision

inArticle2,paragraph1thedraftregulation,particularattentionwaspaidtothe

emphasisofthisprovision.Itwasnotedthatthecollectivenatureofthesources

oflabourbecomelabourlawonlywhenthepartiesoftheseagreementsandother

normativeagreementsareboundinthelegalsenseoftheterm.

InArticle2,paragraph1thedraftregulationusesthephrase“labourlawpro-

visionsapplicabletoemploymentrelationships.”Teywerethereforethescope

ofnationalstandards,thesubstantivelabourlaw,betweenwhichconﬂictsshould

beresolvedinthemannerindicatedinthisdraftregulation.TeEuropeanCom-

missionasanauthorofuniformprivateinternationallabourlawsoughttoresolve

conﬂictsofnationalstandardswithinthescopeofindividualemploymentlaw.

Telegalstatusoflabourstandardswithinthemeaningofthisprojectweretobe

governedsolelybytheindividualemploymentlaw.

Terangeofadjustmentoftheconﬂictoflawrulesdidnotincludelegal

issuesrelatingtolegalcapacityandcapabilitytocarryoutlegalactsregulatedby

nationallawofindividualemploymentlaw.Inparticular,itdidnotconcernthe

abilitytoenterintocontractsofemployment.ProvisionofArticle2,paragraph2

ofthisdraftregulationexplicitlyexcludefromthescopeoftheproposedregula-

tionofprivateinternationallabourlawthe(capacity)ofthepartiestoenterinto

contractsofemployment.Conﬂictsofthesubstantiverulesonmattersrelating

tothedeﬁnitionofcontractingcapacityweretoremaininthehandsofthecon-

ﬂictoflawrulesofprivateinternationallaw,regardlessofwhetherthecasewas

governedbytheaboveinlabourlaworcivillaw.Teabsenceoflegalcapacitywas

tobegovernedinthesamewaywithappropriatethelegalconsequences.

TeconsideredArticle2,paragraph2ofthedraftregulationdoesnotexplain

therulesbywhichtheywouldbegovernedbythenationalconﬂictsofsubstantive

labourlaw,layingdownrulesfortheabilitytoestablishformallabourrelations.

Tissituationmaybeinterpretedasaconsciousandintentionalbytheauthor

who–duetothespeciﬁcrequirementsforcandidatesforpublicservice–left

themattertoestablishthecapacityofformallabourrelationsgovernedbyspe-

ciﬁclegislation,andnotgenerallyapplicablenormsandstandardsofcivillaw.

Giventherelativelylargenumberoffailures,committedbytheCommunityin

theconﬂictoflawsproject,onecannotruleoutthemistakesmadebytheEuro-

peanCommission.Finally,thethirdversionoftheexplanationproposedabove

fornationallegislationtoregulateconﬂictsofsubstantivelaw(civillaworlabour

law),specifyingcertainaspectsoflegalcapacitytoperformcertainlegalacts(con-

tractsofemployment)maybeexplainedbyﬁndingthatthecurrentdraftregula-

tiondoesnotregulateconﬂictsofothernationalstandards,individualsubstantive

labourlawbeyondthosethatcanbeusedtoregulatethelegalpositionofthe

partiesinbindinglabourrelations.Eachofthethreehypothesesisjustiﬁed.Inmy

opinion,themostlikelyhypothesisistheﬁrst.Itremainstheclearestandmost

Brak wyników

European Union Private International Labour Law (EU PILL)

Treść książki

Znajdź bibliotekę blisko siebie, i uzyskaj dostęp do ebooka w systemie IBUK Libra