Treść książki
Przejdź do opcji czytnikaPrzejdź do nawigacjiPrzejdź do informacjiPrzejdź do stopki
M.Chęciek:Someaspectsofrealisationofspeechunitsinstuttering…
43
[%]
60
45
30
15
0
a)Nofwordrepetition(1-2)
p=000254
36.2
1stword
p=000438
17.619.1
1stand2nd>
p=000090
29.8
p=000404
54.5
49.2
b)
Nofwordrepetition(1-3>)
Agegroups
-A
-B
-C
21.3
1stword
10.3
7.9
1stand2nd>
12.7
17.6
23.8
Figures4aand4b.Prototypesofclonustypeonthewordlevel
C=31adults,49.2%).Testatisticalsignificancelevelofgroupsincomparisonwith
groupA(p=0,0090alsop=0,0404)isnoticedhere.Prototypicalgroupswiththis
blockingcategorywillbegroupB.Tus,groupAbecomesnotprototypical.Statisti-
callysignificantdiferenceswerealsonoticeable,asprototypicalpicture4ashows,in
caseofblockingthefirstwordofthesentencewiththenumberofrepetitionsonceor
twicebetweengroupA(N=17,36.2%)andgroupsB(N=12,17.6%)andC(N=12,
19.1%),thatisp=0,0254andp=0,0438.Teprototypicalgroupinthiscategoryof
dysfluencyisgroupA,whereasgroupsBandCarenotprototypical.Telowestesca-
lationofthisblockingcategorywasnoticedincaseofrepetitionofthefirstwordin
thesentence1-3>timesingroupsC(N=5,7.9%)andB(N=7,10.3%).
Summary
Fromtheresearchcarriedoutafertheverificationofseparatehypotheses,the
followingobservationsandnotionswereputforward(amongothersthings):
1.Inallagegroupsthemostofenoccurredthecategoriesofparalleltonusblocks
onsubcategoryofvowelsandconsonantinthreephoneticpositions,thatisin
theinitial,middleandfinalsoundsintheword.Tediferencesbetweengroups
werenoticeableincaseoftonusblockingontheconsonantsandvowelsinthe
initialsound.Tesignificantdiferencesbetweengroupswerenotobserved,
analysingthepositionandnumberofrepetitions(1-2aswellas1-3>)incase
ofparalleltonusblockingonvowelsandconsonants.Terefore,thebiggestpro-
totypicalescalationwasnoticeableintheinitialsoundincaseofparallelblocked
vowelsandconsonantsingroupB(N=56,66.7%).Tebiggestnumberofrep-
etitionsinsubcategorywasobservedandalsoingroupB(N=31,41.9%),what
cansignifytheinnovativenatureofnumberofrepetitionsandthegroup.
