Treść książki

Przejdź do opcji czytnikaPrzejdź do nawigacjiPrzejdź do informacjiPrzejdź do stopki
(2005)interaction-basedmodel14.Practice-centredframesembracesuchiden-
tityframesas:instructional(ateacher’sindividualconceptionsofhowtoper-
formvariousteachingacts),disciplinary(ateacher’saffinitywithfieldsrelated
toTESOL,suchaslinguistics,education,psychology),professional(ateacher’s
interpretationoftheknowledge,standardsandpracticesresultingfromher
educationandexperience),vocational(ateacher’scommitmenttoherwork)
andeconomic(theinfluenceoffinancialaspectsofworkonteacher’smotiva-
tion),whereascontextualframesrefertoglobal(ateacher’sinternationalorien-
tationinperformingthework),local(ateacher’slocalorientationinperform-
ingthework)andsocioculturalaspectsofteacherwork(theinfluenceofothers,
includingstudents,colleagues,supervisors,parents).
CreatedforinvestigatingteacheridentityinTESOL,Pennington’smodel
accommodatesmanyaspectsofteachers’liveswhichareunderstoodhereas
Hframes”.Thismultiplicityoffacetsmakingupthemodelofteacheridentity
explicitlyshowcaseshowdiverseteachers’livesareandhowcomplextheir
experiencescanbecome.Pennington’sHframes”conceptoverlapswithBen-
sonetal.’s(2013)Hfacetsofidentity”,asbothcanbeusedtoraiseawareness
ofthemyriadaspectsofteacheridentityand,perhaps,offerdirectionsfor
teacherdevelopmentontheseissues.
1.3.7Trent’s(2015)Framework
Tryingtoconstructamodelofteacheridentity,Trent(2015,pp.47-51)opts
foramultidimensionalframeworkwhichrecognizesdiscursive,experiential,
negotiatedandcontesteddimensionsofteacheridentity.Hisseparationof
identity-in-practiceandidentity-in-discourseacrossintrapersonal,interpersonal
andinstitutionaldimensionsofsocialrealitytestifiestothecomplexityof
teacheridentityconstruction.Whatheemphasizesisthespecialdualitybe-
tweendiscoursewhichrepresentsattitudes,beliefsandvalues,andagency,
whichisshapedbyHtheuniqueresources,competencies,experiences,and
skillsthroughwhichindividualsinterprettheprocessesofbecomingteach-
ers”(p.51).
Trent’sdualtreatmentofidentityacknowledgesboththeroleofstructure
asbeingsociallyandculturallyreproduced,andagencyasbeingcreatively
1111111
14Althoughinitiallyconsideredasoneoftheconceptualtoolstobuilduponinthecrea-
tionofmyframeworkforinvestigatingteachers’identity,inretrospectIabandoned
BucholtzandHall’s(2005)modelforthestudyofidentityastoomuchbasedonsocial
practiceswhoseintricaciesarebeyondthescopeofthiswork.
39